烟草秸秆有机肥对不同种植制度下植烟土壤养分、烟草生长及品质的影响

doi:10.14088/j.cnki.issn0439-8114.2026.10.008

湖北农业科学 ›› 2026, Vol. 65 ›› Issue (10): 51-58.doi: 10.14088/j.cnki.issn0439-8114.2026.10.008

烟草秸秆有机肥对不同种植制度下植烟土壤养分、烟草生长及品质的影响

王玉洁¹, 武东玲¹, 苗圃¹, 郑学博², 陈雪莱², 李海滨², 王惠¹, 徐艳丽²

1.河南省烟草公司洛阳市公司,河南洛阳 471000;
2.中国农业科学院烟草研究所,山东青岛 266101

收稿日期:2026-03-10 出版日期:2026-10-25 发布日期:2026-10-23
通讯作者: 王惠（1984-）,女,河南洛阳人,高级农艺师,硕士,主要从事烟叶生产技术研究与推广工作,(电子信箱)lyyyjszc@126.com;徐艳丽（1988-）,女,山东青岛人,高级农艺师,硕士,主要从事植烟土壤肥力研究,(电子信箱)xu87147519@163.com。
作者简介:王玉洁（1986-）,女,河南开封人,高级农艺师,硕士,主要从事烟叶生产技术研究与推广工作,(电子信箱)wyjanguie@126.com
基金资助:
中国烟草总公司河南省公司洛阳市公司科技项目（2023410300200045）

Effects of tobacco straw organic fertilizer on soil nutrients, tobacco growth and quality in tobacco-planting soils under different cropping systems

WANG Yu-jie¹, WU Dong-ling¹, MIAO Pu¹, ZHENG Xue-bo², CHEN Xue-lai², LI Hai-bin², WANG Hui¹, XU Yan-li²

1. Luoyang Branch of Henan Tobacco Company, Luoyang 471000, Henan, China;
2. Institute of Tobacco Research , Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Qingdao 266101, Shandong, China

Received:2026-03-10 Published:2026-10-25 Online:2026-10-23

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为明确烟草秸秆有机肥在连作与轮作烟田中的适宜施用量,并系统评估其对土壤性状、烟草生长及烟叶品质的综合效应,在河南洛阳烟区分别选取5年连作地块和烟-麦轮作地块,以单施450 kg/hm²化学复合肥为对照,设置3 000、6 000、9 000 kg/hm² 3个有机肥水平（均配施450 kg/hm²化学复合肥）,开展田间随机区组试验。基于土壤理化性质、微生物群落指标及烟草产量与品质的实测数据,结合主成分分析不同处理的载荷综合得分,综合评价结果表明,轮作条件下,3 000 kg/hm²处理对土壤理化性质、微生物群落及烟草产量与品质的综合提升效果最优;连作条件下,9 000 kg/hm²处理的综合效果最佳,但 6 000 kg/hm²处理的产值与产量在所有连作处理中最为突出。

关键词: 烟草, 秸秆, 有机肥, 种植制度, 连作, 轮作, 土壤养分, 烟草生长, 烟草品质

Abstract: To determine the appropriate application rate of tobacco straw organic fertilizer in continuous cropping and non-continuous cropping tobacco fields and to systematically evaluate its comprehensive effects on soil properties, tobacco growth and tobacco leaf quality, a field randomized block experiment was conducted in tobacco-growing areas of Luoyang, Henan Province, using a five-year continuous cropping plot and a tobacco-wheat rotation (non-continuous cropping) plot, with the application of 450 kg/hm² chemical compound fertilizer alone as the control, and with three organic fertilizer application rates of 3 000, 6 000 and 9 000 kg/hm², each combined with 450 kg/hm² chemical compound fertilizer. Based on the measured data of soil physical and chemical properties, microbial community indicators, and tobacco yield and quality, and combined with the comprehensive loading scores of different treatments obtained by principal component analysis, the comprehensive evaluation results showed that under non-continuous cropping conditions, the 3 000 kg/hm² treatment had the best overall improvement effect on soil physical and chemical properties, microbial communities, and tobacco yield and quality; under continuous cropping conditions, the 9 000 kg/hm² treatment showed the best overall effect, but the 6 000 kg/hm² treatment was the most prominent among all continuous cropping treatments in output value and yield.

Key words: tobacco, straw, organic fertilizer, cropping system, continuous cropping, non-continuous cropping, soil nutrients, tobacco growth, tobacco quality

中图分类号:

S156

王玉洁, 武东玲, 苗圃, 郑学博, 陈雪莱, 李海滨, 王惠, 徐艳丽. 烟草秸秆有机肥对不同种植制度下植烟土壤养分、烟草生长及品质的影响[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2026, 65(10): 51-58.

WANG Yu-jie, WU Dong-ling, MIAO Pu, ZHENG Xue-bo, CHEN Xue-lai, LI Hai-bin, WANG Hui, XU Yan-li. Effects of tobacco straw organic fertilizer on soil nutrients, tobacco growth and quality in tobacco-planting soils under different cropping systems[J]. HUBEI AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES, 2026, 65(10): 51-58.

参考文献

[1] 国家统计局农村社会经济调查司.中国农村统计年鉴(2023)[M].北京:中国统计出版社,2023.
[2] ZHANG H, WU J H.Statistical optimization of sodium hydroxide pretreatment and enzymatic hydrolysis of corn stover powder for enhancing sugar production using response surface methodology[J]. Biomass conversion and biorefinery, 2023, 13(8): 7111-7125.
[3] 郑坚强,刘彬,王小飞,等.烟草秸秆纳米纤维素的制备及表征分析[J].河南农业科学,2021,50(3):165-173.
[4] ZHU X P, YUAN J L, QU H L, et al.Effects of different proportions of fruit tree branches on nicotine content and microbial diversity during composting of tobacco waste[J]. Journal of environmental management, 2024, 365: 121568.
[5] WANG Y T, LUO X Y, CHU P, et al.Cultivation and application of nicotine-degrading bacteria and environmental functioning in tobacco planting soil[J]. Bioresources and bioprocessing, 2023, 10(1): 10.
[6] CASTELLANOS-SÁNCHEZ J E,AGUILAR-AGUILAR F A, HERNÁNDEZ-ALTAMIRANO R, et al. Biogas purification processes: Review and prospects[J]. Biofuels, 2024, 15(2): 215-227.
[7] LIU M, LINNA C, MA S M, et al.Biochar combined with organic and inorganic fertilizers promoted the rapeseed nutrient uptake and improved the purple soil quality[J]. Frontiers in nutrition, 2022, 9: 997151.
[8] CHEN H P, LIN G Y, WANG X H, et al.Physicochemical properties and hygroscopicity of tobacco stem biochar pyrolyzed at different temperatures[J]. Journal of renewable and sustainable energy, 2016, 8: 013112.
[9] 樊俊,谭军,王瑞,等.秸秆还田和腐熟有机肥对植烟土壤养分、酶活性及微生物多样性的影响[J].烟草科技,2019,52(2):12-18,61.
[10] BLEIZGYS R, POVILAITIS A, PEKARSKAS J, et al.Effectiveness of the sustainable manure pile model for ammonia emission and soil[J]. Agronomy, 2024, 14(7): 1475.
[11] 谢莉. 有机肥对植烟土壤微生物活性及烤烟产量品质的影响[D].重庆:西南大学,2010.
[12] FLOWER K C, HÜBERLI D, COLLINS S J, et al. Progression of plant-parasitic nematodes and foliar and root diseases under no-tillage with different crop rotations[J]. Soil and tillage research, 2019, 191: 18-28.
[13] 罗优,韩天华,张雪奇,等.有机肥施肥方式和配施减氮肥对烟草生长·产量和质量的影响[J].安徽农业科学,2023,51(21):157-160.
[14] JIANG Y L, ZHANG R Q, ZHANG C P, et al.Long-term organic fertilizer additions elevate soil extracellular enzyme activities and tobacco quality in a tobacco-maize rotation[J]. Frontiers in plant science, 2022, 13: 973639.
[15] 刘楚祺,赵高坤,邓小鹏,等.连作年限对植烟土壤养分和微生物量及胞外酶化学计量特征的影响[J].云南农业大学学报,2023,38(5):494-502.
[16] TESHITA A, KHAN W, ULLAH A, et al.Soil nematodes in agroecosystems: Linking cropping system’s rhizosphere ecology to nematode structure and function[J]. Journal of soil science and plant nutrition, 2024, 24(4): 6467-6482.
[17] 施河丽,谭军,秦兴成,等.不同生物有机肥对烤烟生长发育及产质量的影响[J].中国烟草科学,2014,35(2):74-78.
[18] 鲍士旦. 土壤农化分析[M].3版.北京:中国农业出版社,2000.
[19] YC/T 142—2010,烟草农艺性状调查测量方法[S].
[20] GB2635—1992,烤烟[S].
[21] LEE S B, LEE C H, JUNG K Y, et al.Changes of soil organic carbon and its fractions in relation to soil physical properties in a long-term fertilized paddy[J]. Soil and tillage research, 2009, 104(2): 227-232.
[22] 曲成闯,陈效民,张志龙,等.生物有机肥提高设施土壤生产力减缓黄瓜连作障碍的机制[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2019, 25(5):814-823.
[23] 孟婷婷,杨亮彦,孔辉,等.生物有机肥施用量对土壤有机碳组分及酶活性的影响[J].北方园艺,2022(17):86-91.
[24] 沈其荣.中国有机(类)肥料[M].北京:中国农业出版社,2021.
[25] 张鹏,贾志宽,路文涛,等.不同有机肥施用量对宁南旱区土壤养分、酶活性及作物生产力的影响[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2011,17(5):1122-1130.
[26] 臧小平,周兆禧,林兴娥,等.不同用量有机肥对芒果果实品质及土壤肥力的影响[J].中国土壤与肥料,2016(1):98-101.
[27] 刘熙明,袁静超,梁尧,等.还田方式对玉米秸秆腐解特征及其节肥潜力的影响[J].农业资源与环境学报,2025,42(2):404-411.
[28] 王双千,张琳玲,陈江辉,等.生物菌肥在花生上的应用效果初探[J].浙江农业科学,2017,58(6):974-975,980.
[29] 薛彦飞,薛文,张树兰,等.长期不同施肥对塿土团聚体胶结剂的影响[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2015,21(6):1622-1632.
[30] 王欢欢,任天宝,元野,等.生物质炭与氮肥配施对植烟土壤微生物量碳、氮和碳氮比的影响[J].中国农学通报,2017,33(12):52-57.
[31] 解晓菲,孔伟,向炳青,等.烟秆生物有机肥与化肥配施对白肋烟的影响[J].湖北农业科学,2012,51(2):240-242.
[32] 农传江,汤利,徐智,等.有机肥部分替代化肥对土壤有机碳库和烤烟经济性状的影响[J].中国土壤与肥料,2016(4):70-75.
[33] LI F, CHEN L, JIA Z J, et al.Core microbial taxonomies that maintain high organic carbon content in upland soil[J]. Science of the total environment, 2024, 939: 173300.
[34] ARAUJO A S F, DE MEDEIROS E V, DA COSTA D P, et al. From desertification to restoration in the Brazilian semiarid region: Unveiling the potential of land restoration on soil microbial properties[J]. Journal of environmental management, 2024, 351: 119746.
[35] TAN G, LIU Y J, PENG S G, et al.Soil potentials to resist continuous cropping obstacle: Three field cases[J]. Environmental research, 2021, 200: 111319.
[36] YANG B Y, FENG C C, JIANG H, et al.Effects of long-term continuous cropping on microbial community structure and function in tobacco rhizosphere soil[J]. Frontiers in microbiology, 2025, 16: 1496385.

烟草秸秆有机肥对不同种植制度下植烟土壤养分、烟草生长及品质的影响

Effects of tobacco straw organic fertilizer on soil nutrients, tobacco growth and quality in tobacco-planting soils under different cropping systems

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	陈鹏, 李双晓, 史亮涛, 陆泽平, 李行, 陈丽美, 李小英. 有机肥与微生物肥配施对西南地区葡萄园土壤养分及酶活性的影响[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2026, 65(9): 40-47.
[2]	杨恩华. 秸秆还田与氮素管理对小麦根际土壤微生物群落结构的协同调控效应[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2026, 65(9): 52-59.
[3]	杨勇, 刘海霞, 李娅妮, 王玉龙, 郭存武, 叶辰, 刘飞. 生物协同改良破解林下潞党参连作障碍的效应与机制[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2026, 65(7): 140-144.
[4]	邓哲红, 王薇, 邓时锋, 崔国贤, 佘玮, 王帅斌, 王东, 曹晓兰. 基于改进粒子群优化的多生育期烟草LAI估测[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2026, 65(7): 208-214.
[5]	吕玉, 向云刚, 王伟, 侯明兴, 字春光, 黄茜蕊. 云南省保山市咖啡园土壤养分特征及肥力综合评价[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2026, 65(6): 52-58.
[6]	段媛媛, 王帆帆, 唐涛, 郭杰, 王晓月, 周武先, 游景茂. 不同生长年限叶用银杏叶黄酮含量与土壤养分化学计量特征的关系[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2026, 65(6): 128-132.
[7]	梁伊菲, 汪光泽, 王灏滢, 段成娇, 栗丽, 谢钧宇, 李廷亮. 秸秆还田量对旱地麦田土壤氮素动态及小麦产量形成的影响[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2026, 65(5): 63-69.
[8]	章彧豪, 周剑雄, 熊又升, 袁家富, 徐祥玉, 李继福, 刘威. 江汉平原稻麦轮作下不同秸秆还田方式的产量与养分效应[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2026, 65(5): 70-75.
[9]	王大彬, 周显升, 刘志广, 彭富余, 于卫松, 邱军. 基于近红外光谱的烟草品质相似性度量算法构建及应用探究[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2026, 65(5): 172-178.
[10]	张鹏, 张泽志, 游磊, 郑兰兰, 张勇洪. 蒲儿根基因组大小评估与特征分析[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2026, 65(5): 214-220.
[11]	范晓晖, 陈慕松, 刘文婷, 谢星, 林旭, 王烈萍, 何春梅. 不同绿肥还田对设施葡萄园土壤养分、酶活性和微生物生物量的影响[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2026, 65(4): 55-60.
[12]	陈玲婷, 徐圣凯, 杨艳华, 孙光伟, 冯吉, 尹刚华, 陈振国, 邓建强, 佀国涵. 不同脂肪含量菜子饼肥对烟叶油分及质量的影响[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2026, 65(4): 75-80.
[13]	陈振国, 冯吉, 孙玉晓, 闫加力, 田辉文, 宋洪昌, 柴利广, 熊双莲, 涂书新, 张允政, 李伟, 刘必成, 孙敬国. 连作植烟土壤环境因子变化及其对烤烟化学品质的影响[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2026, 65(4): 81-89.
[14]	常肖锐, 王政, 徐婉婷, 牛牧青, 郑永良. 菌糠有机肥对甘薯根际土壤酶活性及细菌群落的影响[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2026, 65(4): 90-95.
[15]	任冬雪, 丁贵江, 穆云森, 李一, 杨志会, 李青松, 刘美艳, 梁秋华. 生物有机肥氮替代部分化肥氮对玉米产量、养分利用及氮肥利用效率的影响[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2026, 65(4): 96-101.