Application of a comprehensive evaluation system with a combination weighting method based on game theory in soybean regional test

doi:10.14088/j.cnki.issn0439-8114.2023.04.001

Abstract

Abstract: 15 soybean varieties（lines） from the summer soybean [Glycine max （Linn.） Merr.] regional test in Henan Province in 2014 were comprehensively evaluated based on a comprehensive evaluation system which was constructed with the method of analytic hierarchy process（AHP）, entropy weight method and combination weighting method based on game theory, thus to provide a method and basis for the reasonable evaluation of the tested lines in the soybean regional test. The results showed that the correlation coefficient between the combined weights determined by the combination weighting method based on game theory and the weights determined by AHP was 0.897（P<0.01）, and this value was 0.282（P>0.05） between the combined weights and weights determined by entropy weight method. There were no significant differences in the comprehensive scores among the three weighting methods. The correlation coefficient of the comprehensive score ranking between the combination weighting method based on game theory and the analytic hierarchy process was 0.872 （P<0.01）, and this value between the combination weighting method based on game theory and the entropy method was 0.603 （P<0.05）, respectively. It showed good consistency with the actual performance, certification and promotion of the lines. The above results indicated that the evaluation system constructed with the combination weighting based on game theory could scientifically and reasonably determine the weights of the indicators in the soybean comprehensive evaluation system, and the comprehensive evaluation system constructed based on this could make a reasonable evaluation of the comprehensive performance of the tested lines in the soybean regional test.

Key words: soybean[Glycine max （Linn.） Merr.], analytic hierarchy process, entropy weight method, combination weighting, game theory, comprehensive evaluation

CLC Number:

S529
S-03

ZAN Kai, CHEN Ya-guang, XU Shu-xia, ZHOU Qing, WANG Feng-ju, YANG Hui-feng, ZHENG Li-min, GUO Hai-fang, LI Ming-jun, LIU Ting. Application of a comprehensive evaluation system with a combination weighting method based on game theory in soybean regional test[J]. HUBEI AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES, 2023, 62(4): 1-6.

References

[1] 史宏. 不同生态类型大豆农艺性状与产量关系的研究[J].华北农学报, 2018, 33(1):150-159.
[2] 安东,来兴发,邓建强,等. TOPSIS法评价南方大豆品种在黄土高原地区的饲用潜力[J].草地学报,2019,27(6):1710-1717.
[3] 田艺心, 曹鹏鹏, 高凤菊.基于主成分、隶属函数和聚类分析的大豆耐盐性综合评价[J].山东农业科学,2020,52(4):16-22.
[4] 昝凯,周青,张志民,等.灰色关联度和DTOPSIS法综合分析河南区域试验中大豆新品种(系)的农艺性状表现[J].大豆科学,2018,37(5):664-671.
[5] 张凡,薛鑫,刘国涛,等.基于灰色关联度分析法和聚类分析法筛选小麦高产优质新品种(系)的研究[J].中国农学通报, 2020, 36(27):6-13.
[6] 王兵, 谢红丽, 任洪洋, 等.基于层次分析法的石油污染土壤修复植物评价[J].安全与环境学报, 2019, 19(3): 985-991.
[7] 倪九派,李萍,魏朝富,等.基于AHP和熵权法赋权的区域土地开发整理潜力评价[J].农业工程学报,2009,25(5): 202-209.
[8] 黄维忠. 基于熵权的层次分析法在船舶投资决策中的应用[J].上海海运学院学报, 2000, 21(1): 97-101.
[9] 王晓斌, 王翰, 胡开明, 等.基于层次分析法和GGE双标图对引进马铃薯种质资源的综合评价[J].植物遗传资源学报, 2017, 18(6): 1067-1078.
[10] 王巧良, 南歆格, 史琰, 等.基于AHP法的矾根品种综合评价——以冬季杭州地区绿墙应用为例[J]. 河南农业科学, 2019, 48(9): 137-142.
[11] 李春燕, 卢桂宾, 刘和, 等.用层次分析方法和DTOPSIS法综合评价团枣品种[J].山西农业科学,2019,47(12):2057-2061.
[12] 王江民, 钱均祥, 许宗亮, 等.应用层次分析法确定鲜食玉米品质指标的优先等级[J].西南农业学报,2019,32(9):2192-2196.
[13] ZOU Z H, YUN Y, SUN J N.Entropy method for determination of weight of evaluating indicators in fuzzy synthetic evaluation for water quality assessment[J]. Journal of environmental sciences, 2006, 18(5): 1021-1023.
[14] 马宁,刘艳霞, 李想, 等.基于熵权法综合评价植物根际促生菌对烟草的促生作用[J].南京农业大学学报,2020,43(5):887-895.
[15] 刘刚, 赵桂琴, 魏黎明.基于熵权法的灰色系统理论在燕麦品种综合评价中的应用[J].中国草地学报,2007,29(3):84-89.
[16] 轩瑞瑞,陈艳萍,刘春菊, 等.基于熵权法和灰色关联度法的鲜食糯玉米品质评价[J].食品工业科技,2021,42(14):241-248.
[17] 李萍, 魏朝富, 邱道特.基于熵权法赋权的区域耕地整理潜力评价[J].中国农学通报, 2007, 23(6):536-541.
[18] 潘守慧,王开义,王志彬,等.基于改进灰色关联度和TOPSIS的作物育种材料评价方法[J].中国农业科技导报,2018,20(3):145-154.
[19] 赵奎, 刘维发, 曾鹏, 等.基于博弈论组合赋权TOPSIS法的深部进路参数优选[J].有色金属科学与工程, 2018, 9(2): 70-74.
[20] 迟道才, 马涛, 李松.基于博弈论的可拓评价方法在灌区运行状况评价中的应用[J].农业工程学报,2008,24(8):36-39.
[21] 李建明,于雪梅,王雪威, 等.基于产量品质和水肥利用效率西瓜滴灌水肥制度优化[J].农业工程学报, 2020, 36(9): 75-83.
[22] 马乐乐, 高宁, 杨百良, 等.全有机营养模式下番茄综合品质评价及其对有机肥水耦合的响应[J].西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 47(6): 63-72.
[23] 陈家良. 基于博弈论的组合赋权评价方法研究[J].福建电脑, 2003(9): 15-16.
[24] 叶宗裕. 关于多指标综合评价中指标正向化和无量纲化方法的选择[J].浙江统计, 2003(4): 24-25.
[25] 卢卫国, 李卫东, 梁慧珍, 等. DTOPSIS法综合评价大豆新品种的初步探索[J].中国油料作物学报, 1998, 20(3): 22-26.
[26] 刘艳. 试用隶属函数分析法对大豆品种进行综合评价[J].大豆科技, 2014(4): 14-17.